global $user_info; { echo '
Sosua girls
'; }

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
it happens everyday and will never stop.  I know more girls i met in DR in New York now than i do in DR.  I dont warn anybody.  Live and let live. 
2
Ok  a few years back there were suckers whifing up hoes getting them visa green cards cars house boats u  name it.  Hook line and sinker.   Have yoy evever try and warn any one dont do it  dont pull the trigger !
3
Trip Reports / Re: The Su STILL Legendary [The Sequel] 2023
« Last post by TheRealDallas on Today at 08:24:54 AM »
Still zero pics 🤔
4
Trip Reports / Re: March 2023 Short stay…
« Last post by TheRealDallas on Today at 08:09:26 AM »
Still no pics 😒
5
Newbies Ask Your Sosua Questions Here / Re: Sosua girls
« Last post by tugboaboat5393 on Today at 07:30:49 AM »
Like posted i was the fat balding older dude 60 plus. I theoq on soncw decenr clean cloths bruth the remaining teeth mourh wqsh some cheap mwns colone of to the races.    Now on the orther hand stinky skanjy low level chicas can be nasty yup its a 2 way street] lets say for a few exsamples  the tall skinny homless chica. Homeless as can be but barging basement 300 peso blow jobs. Or the one eye haitian chica be shes cheap. She is looking cleaner and has a cell phone. Any one bang her is her toto wet hehe !
6
It’s really specific but the first part I agree with, but not the second. Rather 95% of the time a guy should be flexible, and exercise an array of options. However in a specific scenario such as an up charge before or after, should always be addressed the same. Total elimination as a potential prospect. The person showed they are no longer trustworthy, so eliminating them is the only option. Anything else is foolish and shouldn’t be considered, no exceptions.

As I said before finishing the session, canceling, renegotiating is fine as you want to avoid a conflict. However after the specific issue/session no future business needs to be done, even if it were good, purely off principal, responsibility, and safety.
There is a concept issue here.  Your understanding of what one size fits all means, versus how I interpreted one size fits all in my general statement. 

This is the basic concept of what one size fits all means :   one size fits all

1. Supposedly well-suited to ANY situation, as of a product, method, solution, etc.

2. relating to policies or approaches that are standard and not tailored to individual needs.

My statement that you disagree with, was a general statement that would apply to ALL situations, not specific ones.   

What you described is not a one size fits all ( all situations ) policy.  Your policy is a specific response for specific scenarios.   That is not the exact same concept that I was describing. 

Also your specific response/policy does not match the definition of what one size fits all means, which was described above.

I aside from that, I have a better understanding of what you mean.  Which I dont have a problem with.  It still reverts back to what I said at the beginning.  A guy can choose to handle a situation anyway he sees fit.  That statement covers all bases.  General or specific situations. 

BTW if my statement read like this, then I can see a reason to disagree.   "It's not necessary to have one policy for specific situations."    But if someone says it's not necessary to have a one size fits all policy.  Before disagreeing, wouldnt one need to know how that statement is being applied?  What do they mean by that?  For all situations, or specific situations?  Without knowing those details, there can be no disagreement. 
7
poon you sound sus!
you say a heterosexual black man!
dude you are white!
poon you are white.
cmon man.

Lol. The only thing white on me is my teeth and my gold. That’s about it. 😆
8
Blocking is akin to throwing a tantrum. I prefer to just archive the conversation and simply don’t respond. Bitches hate to be ignored. I definitely don’t want to burn a bridge because a chick was late. I find it better to use her tardiness as leverage in some future negotiation. While they’re keen on taking your money they don’t really respect you until they find a reason to do so.

Blocking is efficient mongering lol. I could care less what a prostitute thinks, feels, or respects because her only goal with us is to get our money.
9
poon you sound sus!
you say a heterosexual black man!
dude you are white!

Lol. The only thing white on me is my teeth and my gold. That’s about it. 😆
10
When late or I consider dropping them for slights, i just pay the 2000-2500 agreed upon, no tip or repeat service. I explicitly explain why they annoyed me, and why they aren’t getting moto/gas/tip and I likely won’t repeat with them or help them out with food or anything else anymore. I let them see pictures of me in other countries and with better looking women, who aren’t as much of a headache. I let them know we both have options and I’m here for 2-4 weeks with a set amount of money for chicas and they are not going to be getting anything else out of me so Monday through Thursday good luck when I’m still there and the weekend guys are gone because they’ll still see me but I’m curving them repeatedly
Basically a guy can handle a situation anyway he sees fit.  It's not necessary to have a one size fits all policy.   I have handled situations similarly to the way you described.  Ive also aborted going forward with chicks that were late or what I consider a no show.   Ive done it with their knowledge or without their knowledge.  For instance if a chick is not where she is supposed to be at an agreed time.  Offers no feedback, no information.   I dont feel I owe the chick any explanation for aborting or changing my plans. 

If they indeed show up, I dont feel any responsibility towards them.   For any chick to feel the need to blow my phone up once she realizes her date is gone/unavailable, but she didnt take that same initiative of communicating her lateness.  I have no empathy for shit like that.

Muggs that operate like that , and think it's the mans fault for aborting or moving on, only get exposed to the possibility of changing, through negative reinforcement.   Ive had a few chicks get upset or mad because I left the scene, or turned off my phone.  If we communicate again, I just make it clear that they did it to themselves.  I was where I was supposed to be,  you werent.

You never communicated you were on your way.  Never communicated that you were going to be late.  So WTF do you expect to happen?   Guess what usually happens?   Next time,  they do the same shit, and see me being consistent.  Or they make a conscious effort to avoid the same shit happening again.   When I abort, I may turn off my phone.  So I dont hear no lies, and Im not responsible for the chicks transpo costs.    Basically I dont care if I miss out on that particular juice, because of my decision to abort.   I tend to care more about using opportunities like that to practice and sharpen my sense of responsibility to my self.
this is one of the few times we’ll disagree. My one size fit all policy is a price change in the room. If she plays me crazy and says something like “oh 2000 I meant 3000 I heard you wrong or didn’t understand” and is adamant that it wasnt what she heard and won’t even budge off 2500 but is stern on the 1000 peso up charge it’s calls for immediate termination. I may smash to avoid a headache or issue, but I never will go back or do business. We can have 3-5 years of good service, if I feel you’re trying to rip me off I’m never going to go back to you. I’ve smashed chics for 1000 peso in Sosua because I legit told them “I have no more money today(I’m not paying atm fees for 500-3000 peso, sex not that important when o can wait until later or she can take an IOU), just wanted to smoke and drink and don’t come to my place with expectations because I don’t pay for companionship. I’ll pay for sex, but not to feed you and get you intoxicated on my dime, for another guy and I’m still financially responsible for you?” If they are rigid, inflexible and impossible to work with it’s termination regardless of who you are.

They can be flexible for everyone they encounter and like except me. So I do in fact take that personal. I let them know it’s me, because if they really liked me I wouldn’t even be paying for sex. But I understand it’s a job, despite the fact that they can give it away at discount or free whenever they want. So is having issues about money, or them trying to rip me off is an indicator that they don’t like me, or don’t respect me. Doesn’t matter because I’m over the situation due to their actions. I stand by it and will not go back out with them again.
Travelguy you are cracking me up!.  In a lighthearted way.  You said this is one of the few times we'll disagree.  And I see you highlighted only one general statement.  Why did you highlight that general statement which was not directed towards anybody in particular, but you did not highlight the very 1st statement that includes you, and everybody reading that statement?   

You know Im a stickler for people exercising good communications with each other, right?  Cherrypicking information is a sure fire way to create a misunderstanding or an assumed disagreement where there might not be one.   Your original statement that I responded to, did you notice I did not address anything particular about how you operate?   Did you notice that in your statement, you never revealed anything about having a one size fits all policy on lateness?

Did you also notice that I never suggested that you had a one size fits all policy?  How could I or anyone assume that, just from you giving us a glimpse of how you handled a situation?

What that means is, when you saw me say in the next post, It's not necessary to have a one size fits all policy.  You wasnt supposed to attach that statement to you, and then proceed to tell me again how you operate.   Dig bro,  I am cool from the jump on how you or anyone operates.  Your 1st post, and the 2nd post.  Do you, you have that right. 

The statement you were supposed to grasp and apply, was when I said "basically a guy can handle a situation anyway he sees fit."    That statement right there?  You dont see that applying to you?   I covered you, me and anyone else with that very first statement.  It meant, that I acknowledge and respect a guys ( that includes you ) choice in how he handles his situation.   

But you chose to ignore that statement ( scratching my head ), and focus on a general statement that was meant to cover others who choose to apply that, if they wish.  If you do have a one size fits all policy, and somebody else doesnt know you do, how can you assume you disagree with them, if the other person was never aware that you have a one size fits all policy?   

Basically a good % of so called disagreements come from parties misunderstanding, misnterpreting or changing the context of what they read or hear.   

If you never stated that you disagree, I would have never known about it.  That is why Im sort of surprised by you saying that.   Imagine how many other mis-diagnosed disagreements exists on forums like this?  I try to avoid claiming a disagreement until Im sure I know what the other individuals position is.  Getting that info is crucial to making sure there is a clear understanding between parties, using the correct facts, the correct details, and most importantly, understanding the correct CONTEXT of the message being conveyed.  If you omit or ignore info that belongs to the context of the whole message, you will create a disagreement where there might not be one.   

Now if I totally got that wrong, and there is something else where we supposedly disagree, please advise.   Im more than welcome to take a look at it.
It’s really specific but the first part I agree with, but not the second. Rather 95% of the time a guy should be flexible, and exercise an array of options. However in a specific scenario such as an up charge before or after, should always be addressed the same. Total elimination as a potential prospect. The person showed they are no longer trustworthy, so eliminating them is the only option. Anything else is foolish and shouldn’t be considered, no exceptions.

As I said before finishing the session, canceling, renegotiating is fine as you want to avoid a conflict. However after the specific issue/session no future business needs to be done, even if it were good, purely off principal, responsibility, and safety.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2023, SimplePortal